| Site | Last visit | Visits | Latest result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site F | 18 Jun | 4 | 96% · Excellent | 1 obs · 0 NC |
| Site L | 05 Jun | 3 | 94% · Good | 2 obs · 0 NC |
| Site M | 26 Mar | 3 | 92% · Good | 2 obs · 1 NC |
| Site O | 08 May | 5 | 90% · Acceptable | 2 obs · 0 NC |
| Site D | 22 May | 1 | 87% · Acceptable | 3 obs · 1 NC |
| Site I | 09 Apr | 4 | 84% · Requires Improvement | 3 obs · 1 NC |
| Site H | 29 Jan | 2 | 83% · Requires Improvement | 4 obs · 1 NC |
| Site C | 12 Feb | 2 | 79% · Unsatisfactory | 4 obs · 2 NC |
Overall performance sits around Acceptable and is improving - the early visits included an unsatisfactory result and a couple in Requires Improvement, and the most recent have climbed into Good. It is not a straight line, and a couple of sites still need to catch up. Two actions are overdue: the excavation-edge barriers at Site O and the segregation gap at Site D, both being chased to close-out.
A small taste of what your portal does. The full picture - and the parts that save you the most time - we would rather show you properly.
Book a callAnonymised sample data.